Farid TRAD: First of all, we are looking into all the alternatives, such as hydrogen, ammonia and sail power. We are permanently forming partnerships, for example with Energy Observer for hydrogen and startup Syroco for sail propulsion, allowing us to conduct more in-depth reviews and make what we believe are the best choices for the short and long term. We have looked into energy as a whole.
Of course, we are interested in hydrogen, for two reasons: it is an energy source that makes it possible to produce synthetic fuels (such as e-methane) and can also be used directly to power vessels.
However, using hydrogen directly in a vessel requires a huge amount of space on board relative to the goods, which makes its use complicated for long-distance container transportation. Another operating restraint is the maximum period for which this energy can be stored, which is 16 days, while an LNG vessel can run for more than 90 days on a full tank of LNG. Lastly, more than 90% of the world’s hydrogen is currently carbonized as it is produced from gas and oil. Running a vessel on hydrogen today would result in emissions three times higher than with a diesel vessel.
While it is not particularly widely used to power ships, hydrogen is still key as there are a number of synthetic fuels at the origin of the production process: e-methane, e-methanol and even e-ammonia. It is also being considered for the rest of our operations, such as to power reefers (refrigerated containers) at our terminals or to run our trucks on, as is currently the case in a project with one of our supermarket clients.
E-ammonia, produced from hydrogen and nitrogen, is more accessible in terms of technologies and takes up less space on board vessels but presents very significant risks in terms of safety: the molecule is particularly toxic to people, cargos and the environment, and is corrosive. There is also a risk that it will be a long time before ammonia-powered vessels solve their greenhouse gas emissions problem. For example, burning ammonia creates N2O, a very potent greenhouse gas, which has global warming potential (GWP) of 300, compared with 30 for methane.
E-methanol, produced from hydrogen and carbon dioxide, is also an interesting molecule. It nevertheless presents a number of disadvantages: loss of volume (less energy efficient), no existing large-scale distribution network for the time being, average toxicity.
Dual-fuel LNG motorization is a pragmatic industrial solution, with an energy source that is immediately available, in sufficient quantities, with an existing transportation and distribution infrastructure. LNG allows for lower carbon dioxide emissions, with a more significant reduction thanks to the incorporation of biomethane. This is a considerable advantage in combating climate change, which requires not just being carbon neutral in 2050 but also reducing emissions right now in order to ensure that total emissions are as low as possible by 2050. In the long term, LNG may be replaced by e-methane in these vessels, with the aim of achieving our target of being carbon neutral by 2050. This e-methane could even be produced from carbon dioxide captured on vessels.